<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedian&#8217;s view of world history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech4d.com/blog/2007/05/21/coming-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech4d.com/blog/2007/05/21/coming-soon/</link>
	<description>Technology, Web Society</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech 4D &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Wikipedia an anachronism?</title>
		<link>http://www.tech4d.com/blog/2007/05/21/coming-soon/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech 4D &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Wikipedia an anachronism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanmigueltechnology.com/blog/?p=4#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Wikipedia is the encyclopedia format itself because most interesting topics defy consensus. Take my original example of the American War of 1812 - was it the result of upstart United States taking advantage of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia is the encyclopedia format itself because most interesting topics defy consensus. Take my original example of the American War of 1812 - was it the result of upstart United States taking advantage of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech 4D &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on Wikipedian's view of world history</title>
		<link>http://www.tech4d.com/blog/2007/05/21/coming-soon/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech 4D &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on Wikipedian's view of world history</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanmigueltechnology.com/blog/?p=4#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] news! - Earlier I pointed out a trivial example of conflicting editorial views on history within Wikipedia. Recently, someone resolved the conflict by completely deleting the entire [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news! - Earlier I pointed out a trivial example of conflicting editorial views on history within Wikipedia. Recently, someone resolved the conflict by completely deleting the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
